Details
-
Improvement
-
Status: Open
-
Normal
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
Description
The consequence of not having a consistent logical field name forces a developer to always use to the explicit namespaced JCR item name to refer to a field, like in code using the new ContentTypeService.
While a logical name might/should not be required, having it optionally available (and then unique within a Document type, including its parents) makes it very useful and possible to use such a logical name independent and abstracted away from its underlying (and then changeable) JCR item name.